People were also concerned about the number of Mosques appearing in England.
from Instituto Manquehue - rss http://ift.tt/2nA3YSS
I desperately want a reporter to ask Sean Spicer what he has in his teeth http://pic.twitter.com/hu3rRAwd6B— Alexandra (@Gallantdesigner) March 27, 2017
If Sean Spicer had true friends, they would've told him that he has something in his teeth, before going on live tv http://pic.twitter.com/BirAs49T45— Vanessa (@vanessa_leighs) March 27, 2017
He literally said: “As part of our plans to solve the Arab-Israeli conflict, we are prepared to build an artificial island in international waters so that Palestinians can stay there. We also have to locate where the new country would be in order for it to be 200 nautical miles away from other countries’ economic zones” The crown prince told al-Sharq al-Awsat daily: “Israel has a divine right to this land, and that is why we must do something to put an end to our Palestinian brothers.”
Salman, the first deputy prime minister, had concocted a strange plan to solve the Arab-Israeli conflict, by which the Palestinians would be deported from their own lands.
The radio station said that the previous round of negotiations on the same subject had taken place in the Egyptian capital a week ago.
Egyptian Daily “Masrawy” related from informed sources, after the end of the previous negotiations, that both Israeli and Egyptian parties spoke of the building of a new gas supply line from the “Tamar” offshore field to Egypt, which should cost around half a billion dollars.
Egypt has been suffering from major difficulty in delivering gas to busy factories, while also attempting to send it to power stations to limit blackouts on civilians.
Egypt had agreed in May 2015 to allow the private sector to import natural gas, and to use the national gas network to market it in exchange for a fee.
Although Egypt’s natural gas production has greatly declined since the early nineties, Egypt was exporting natural gas to the Zionist entity under President Mubarak’s administration for very low prices that would barely cover extraction and production costs.
The conference’s opening ceremony was attended by representatives of Palestinian and Syrian factions and work groups; the Iranian Cultural Chancellory, the Palestinian Youth Organization, the PLO’s Student Office and General Leadership also took part in the conference, whose opening ceremony began with the Palestinian, Syrian, and Iranian national anthems, and a recitation of Surah Al-Fatiha.
Then, Dr. Nidal Hammad made his speech in the name of the conference, followed by the Iran-Palestine Friendship Association’s word by Dr. Mohammad Al-Bahisi, then Damascus’s Iranian Cultural Chancellory’s word by Chancellor Mostafa Najerian, and finally a word by Abdul Karim al-Sharqi, on behalf of the Resistant Youth.
PLO’s General Leadership’s Assistant Secretary General Talal Naji said his word on behalf of Palestine.
Thereafter, both Khaled Abdul Majid, the Secretary General of the Palestinian Popular Resistance Front, and Dr. Mohammad Al-Bahisi had two additional words, the first on Palestinian political developments, the second entitled “God is with us.”
A number of youth and guests also had a number of informative questions and interjections during the first portion of the conference.
Mona Abdel Nasser, the daughter of the former president of Egypt Gamal Abdel Nasser, has danced at Ahmed Ashraf Marwan his son’s wedding that Israel’s ambassador in Cairo, David Govrin, was invited too. It sparked social media activist and users.
According to the Palestinian Information Center, “Egyptian Society in Israel” website released a video that Mona Abdel Nasser was dancing with a folk song playing in the background while Israel’s ambassador to Cairo participated the ceremony.
A large number of movie characters and Arab singers were present at the wedding.
In this regard, the presence of the Israeli ambassador at the wedding of Gamal Abdel Nasser’s grandson was extremely controversial, especially after Mona Abdel Nasser had accused the Israeli intelligence agency of involvement in the assassination of her husband Ashraf Marwan in London.
Ashraf Marwan’s body was found in July 2007 at a hotel in Carlton House district, London.
Mona Abdel Nasser said that her husband confided that he was being pursued by assassins nine days before his death. She believes he was killed by the Mossad.
On the other hand, Zionist newspapers reported Marwan worked for Israeli intelligence agency and gave them many crucial and important information.
Uri Bar Joseph, an analyst and a professor at an Israeli university, wrote in his book “Ashraf Marwan, the Mossad and the Surprise of the Yom Kippur War” that ‘Marwan was Mossad spy for 3 decades. He has been an Israeli spy after 1973 war. He warned Israel that “war will start tomorrow”.
Egypt’s ousted President Hosni Mubarak called Marwan as a nationalist and loyal person. He claimed that Marwan carried out patriotic acts for Egypt. He even denied that Marwan was an Israeli spy.
TV presenters, who supported the military coup in Egypt, ignore the act of Abdel Nasser’s daughter and claimed that it was just a joyful moment and should not be politicized.
But Egyptian activists expressed regret over the dance of the daughter of Egypt’s former president and condemned it.
“To protect its sovereignty and existence, and to provide security for its people, the Islamic Republic of Iran observes no limitation for itself,” reads part of a statement issued by Iran’s Foreign Ministry on Sunday in response to the new unilateral sanctions of the US against Iran.
“The new measures of the American government, in imposing unilateral sanctions beyond its borders against individuals and entities from Iran and other countries based on fabricated and unjustified claims, are unfit to the international laws and regulations and betray the letter and general spirit of the JCPOA.” The statement continues with condemning the acts of Americans and reiterates that Iran will never compromise over its defense programs and capabilities as a measure to conserve its legitimate right of self-defense in face of any foreign aggression and enhancement of its deterrence power against threats.
The announcement affirms that after the statement of the ministry on February 5, 2017, and to put into practice the decision passed by the high council of Iran’s Security, 15 American companies, who have been involved in infringing human rights, whose partnership in anti-humane crimes of the Israeli regime has been clearly proved for the Iranian government, or have been violating the UN resolution 2234, have been put under Iranian government’s sanctions since March 21, 2017.
“Henceforth, any contact with these companies and entities is illegal, their properties and possession within the reach of Iranian government’s jurisdiction will be confiscated, and no Iranian visa will be issued for the people who hold positions in these companies are in relation with them.”
The statement reassures that the Iranian foreign ministry will continue its monitoring of companies, entities, natural and legal persons of American nationality who are involved in the crimes committed by the Israeli regime, supporting terrorism, crackdowns in the countries of the region, or accomplice in destabilizing the region. The statement asserts that if needed more names will be added to the list of those under Iranian government’s sanctions.
The following companies are put into the blacklist of anti-humanitarian companies sanctioned by the government of Iran; BENI Tal, United Technologies produces, RAYTHEON, ITT Corporation, Re/Max Real Estate, Oshkosh Corporation, Magnum Research Inc, Magnum Research Inc., Kahr Arms, M? Aerospace, Military Armament Corporation, Lewis Machine and Tool Company, Daniel Defense, Bushmaster Firearms International, O.F. Mossberg & Sons, and H-S Precision, Inc.
Pravin Togadia, the international working president of Vishwa Hindu Parishad party and a former RSS member has called for a ‘Hindu First Policy’ that seeks to give priority to Hindus at first place in India before any other religious groups such as Muslims. While addressing to his VHP party and Bajrang Dal (youth wing of the extremist VHP) conference, he has demanded some legal initiatives to control the Muslims in the country from growing or receiving welfare benefits.
He further said that the Muslims should not be allowed to have more than two wives and two children. He has demanded restriction on the construction of mosques on the name of Zaheeruddin Babar ( The first Mughal Emperor in India) and on the site of the demolished Babri Mosque, a temple should be built. Furthermore, he expressed his hatred for the Muslims of Kashmir by saying the Pundits (expert in Hindu religion) should be populated in Kashmir.
The summit will be attended by the Egyptian, Palestinian presidents, Saudi and Jordanian monarchs, as well as the Secretary General of Arab League to discuss the Palestinian issue.
The summit, in the presence of four countries leaders – Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Kingdom of Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates – will also discuss the Iranian interference in Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, Syria and Bahrain.
There is some news that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to participate in the meeting in Jordan, according to the information source.
The presence of Netanyahu in Jordan at the same time is a message by some Arab countries to mitigate the anti-Zionism among Arab people replacing it with animosity towards Iran.
There are Arab Gulf efforts sponsored by Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates to implement the Arab-Israeli relations project and to declare Iran as the first enemy of the Arabs in the region. The question that arises is ” who, for his interests, supports all these terrorist organizations in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya and other countries of the region ? Where did the green light come from for waging a brutal war of aggression against Yemen? And the Arab – Arabs war is in the interest of whom? And why the Palestinian issue and the liberation of Jerusalem is absent from all of them including the Arab League making Jerusalem a dramatic file?
The answer is very simple. Iran has become the incubator of resistance in the face of the Israeli enemy and all its supporters. Therefore, the Israeli entity and its Arab clients fantasize about the elimination of Iran. In that way to facilitate expansion of the Israeli state. Iran became a common enemy for Israel, US of America and Gulf princes.
For preserving their interests and the interests of the Zionist entity Gulf princes seek to eliminate Iran. Although Iran calls for unity of all Muslims, not just Shiite , to face the Israeli threat.
Israeli entity is responsible for engineering the war on Syria, Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon under the pretext of sectarianism deceiving Muslims of being the enemy of each other.
Iran openly declares that its main enemy is Israel and the United States that seek to strike and distort the image of Islam, and not Saudi Arabia or Arabs.
Sayyed Abdulmalik Badruddin Al-Houthi said in his speech that aggression misleading titles of their aggression is a cover and deceive from facts, such as the “Arab national security “and ” restoring legitimacy,” are lies and false claims. Moreover engagement with Israel is a threat to Arab national security . The common interests with Israel will only be a threat to the Arab nation and a threat to Arab national security . Their presence Myoun and Socotra focusing on the coast, ports and airports is an occupation. Wherever there is a UAE presence, they are serving as agents whose main task is US and Israel service. “Wherever Saudis are present in any areas of the south and the coast, they are in agent secret service intelligence for America and Israel,” he said.
He said that USA considers destroying and dismantling Arab nation and the plundering of its people and forces embody the implementation of its American agenda. On the economic level, US benefits greatly from the war of aggression . Sheikdom of desert-camel herds provide the USA with Hundreds of billions of dollars plundering the wealth of their country in the American and Israeli coffers instead of benefiting their people . These wars of aggression, a diversion for the Arab nation enhancing stability and sustainable investment with greater control on the region under the name of protection alliance.
Documents revealed secret diplomatic relations between Israel and Arab countries . besides, such documents indicate that Qatar has granted Al-Ada’id military base free of charge to the
United States, and 60% financed by Doha. A secret diplomatic cable dating back to 2009 indicated that there were close secret diplomatic relations between Israel and Gulf states, explaining that Israel and those traditional enemies in the Gulf states had extensive diplomatic relations and exchanged dangerous intelligence, especially on Iran.
In conclusion, Muslim nation shall be aware of its enemy that sheds the blood of its peoples, women and children, and destroy its infrastructure depriving them from their natural resources and dividing the region for its national security.
Before that and before Arab defeated in the Six-Day War, Arab ethnicity was the only prime mover of Arab armies. It could never have its origin, national support and even Arabism of Arab nations.
It is regrettably that even these demi-armies became an instrument for Arab dictators to ensure their political life. In many cases, the power of these armies only is as the power of police who suppress Arab citizens and don’t have guts to stand against Israel.
As the result, peoples of the region gave up their hope for getting out of crisis and achieving their aspirations. This loss led to the formation of resistance groups. It was right here that Arab States tried to resolve the disgraceful gap and at least their political stability to be maintained in the face of their nation.
Hence, they spent a lot on buying weapons and military equipment to cover the fact that they don’t have a powerful national army and undertake marketing for Western weapons.
In the meanwhile, microscopic states of the Persian Gulf felt the need to have such weapons for lacking the elements of national power based on Westerns division mission.
With the start of popular uprising in 1978 and after the victory of the Islamic Revolution in the region, they felt the need for military which hinder nations’ revolution and satisfy Arab political life. As a result, the need led to the formation of some regional coalition that most of them are led by Saudi Arabia. Its sole purpose has been to maintain their dictatorship.
Following the developments of Islamic Awakening, the necessity was raised. Fear of spreading the revolution to the borders of Saudi Arabia and losing the former regional position led Saudis to enter strongly in the case of Syria, Bahrain and Yemen.
Of course, Saudis involving in Bahrain and Syria has cost a lot due to the indirect intervention them, but it wasn’t turned into a swamp like the war on Yemen.
At first, it was supposed that Saudis were able to end the war in Yemen all by themselves and with determination, but the changes indicated hasty and incorrect assessments. They demanded Saudis to justify the destructive war which had international legitimacy.
So picking the term of coalition would bring international legitimacy and even would guarantee their victory.
At first, the proposal was introduced to Pakistanis, but it was rejected for insecurity situations in Pakistan and ruining its international image.
Why the proposal was raised now and why it is accepted?
Choosing a non-Arab state for what Saudis calls the coalition shows that Saudi Arabia don’t trust Arab commanders and technically don’t believe in existing of an Arab qualified commander for such a coalition.
There are intensive disputes between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates which is actively involved in the war against Yemen.
Egyptians, said to have the strongest Arab army among Arabs, refused to join the coalition.
It was concerning for Saudi Arabia that other Arab states be centered in the coalition. In one hand Saudis are willing to win the war in Yemen and on the other hand they don’t tend to share their victory and centrality with another Arab country. This is why idea of creating an Arab NATO or similar suggestions to form a joint Arab military force was failed.
Saudis are trapped into Yemen’s swamp and they did what they did to Emirates out of desperation and changing the battle field.
They were totally aware that no wise country participates in a war that the result is clear now.
But why Pakistanis accept the offer?
Saudi Arabia made promises and gave bribes to Islamabad.
Raheel Sharif is a former commander. Although he had achievements in fighting terrorism in Waziristan region, Pakistan, but he isn’t currently a government official. Maybe Pakistan just gave Saudi Arabia someone useless.
The United States pushed Islamabad.
There is no doubt that both Saudi Arabia and Pakistan won’t benefit from the proposal. It certainly damage the international image of Islamabad.
Because Raheel Sharif is going to take over the command of a rental army that is going to fight with a bunch of women and starving children, not a classical army.
On Thursday, March 20, Abramovich’s plane flew to the northern Lesser Antilles, a group of islands in the Caribbean Sea. On the same day, two aircraft linked to Michael Cohen did the same – one via Palm Beach, Florida, home of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort. It’s important to note that Caribbean nations are famous for their tax haven status, and it’s possible that these trips are purely coincidental.
Abramovich’s aircraft landed in St. Maarten, while two smaller Beauty Central LLC-owned Gulfstream jets landed in Anguilla (one of which stopped in Palm Beach, first.) St. Maarten, St. Martin, St. Barth and Anguilla are nearly the same destination. The islands lie several miles apart and have close economic and social ties. St. Maarten (formerly Dutch) and St. Martin (formerly French) are actually two sides of the same island. Each island has an airport, but they differ in their size and ability to serve large aircraft.
“It’s unclear whether or not any of these flights are related, but further investigation is certainly warranted,” Rosenwald concludes.
Read the full story at the New York Times.
Donald Trump’s approval rating has hit a new low of 36 per cent, according to the latest polling data.
The 36 per cent approval rating in the Gallup poll has was the average for the three days, 24 to 26 March, following Mr Trump’s failure to repeal and replace the health care legislation, Obamacare.
Mr Trump's approval rating was hovering around 46 per cent in the days following his inauguration, also a historically low rating for an incoming president.
Former President Barack Obama’s lowest rating was 38 per cent, recorded twice - once in 2011 and once in 2014.
Presidential approval ratings frequently fluctuate and depend on handling of national crises, pieces of legislation being passed through Congress, and political scandals.
Gallup conducts telephone interviews of over 1,500 Americans of voting age on a daily basis to compile averages to gauge what people think of Mr Trump’s performance in office. There is a margin of error of three points.
A poll done by Quinnipiac University, conducted before the attempt to repeal and replace Obamacare failed, shows that Mr Trump is also losing approval points in demographics he did well with in the 2016 election.
According to the poll, 52 per cent of men surveyed disapprove of Mr Trump compared to 45 per cent in the month prior.
It also stated that nearly half of those surveyed - 48 per cent - think Mr Trump is less honest than most previous presidents.
In October 2008 Republican George W. Bush reached his lowest rating of 25 per cent in the wake of the global financial crisis.
Gallup reports that all presidents whose ratings have fallen to or below 36 per cent have seen them rise later in the year, except for former President Richard Nixon.
A Daily Mail front page focused on Theresa May and Nicola Sturgeon’s legs rather than their politics has sparked anger and condemnation.
http://ift.tt/2ne1C92">British prime minister and Scottish first minister with the headline, ‘Never mind Brexit, who won Legs-it!’" data-reactid="11" style="margin-bottom: 1em; color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">The newspaper’s Tuesday splash showed a picture of the British prime minister and Scottish first minister with the headline, ‘Never mind Brexit, who won Legs-it!’
http://ift.tt/2nIHEH8">of the two leaders was widely panned after it first appeared on Twitter on Monday night, and Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre’s Wikipedia page was hacked." data-reactid="12" style="margin-bottom: 1em; color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">The front page of the two leaders was widely panned after it first appeared on Twitter on Monday night, and Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre’s Wikipedia page was hacked.
The modified Wikipedia entry called him ‘an English Caveman editing British hate promoting paper the Daily Mail’.
http://ift.tt/2ne8X8q">MORE: World’s biggest dinosaur footprints discovered at Australia’s ‘Jurassic Park’
http://ift.tt/2ndRlto"> MORE: Westminster terror attack victim Kurt Cochran was killed on his first trip abroad" data-reactid="14" style="margin-bottom: 1em; color: rgb(38, 40, 42); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">MORE: World’s biggest dinosaur footprints discovered at Australia’s ‘Jurassic Park’
MORE: Westminster terror attack victim Kurt Cochran was killed on his first trip abroad
The two leaders met at Glasgow’s Crowne Plaza Hotel on Monday to discuss Brexit, the triggering of Article 50 on Wednesday and Scotland’s potential independence.
Moronic! And we are in 2017! http://pic.twitter.com/LTGEZdtNo3— Harriet Harman (@HarrietHarman) March 27, 2017
But judging by the Daily Mail’s front page, the newspaper was only interested in one thing.
Inside the paper, an article on the meeting by columnist Sarah Vine was headlined: ‘Finest weapons at their command? Those pins!’
In her column, Vine wrote: ‘But what stands out here are the legs – and the vast expanse on show.
It's 2017. Two women's decisions will determine if United Kingdom continues to exist. And front page news is their lower limbs. Obviously http://pic.twitter.com/AMp0YvtISa— Yvette Cooper (@YvetteCooperMP) March 27, 2017
‘There is no doubt that both women consider their pins to be the finest weapon in their physical arsenal. Consequently, both have been unsheathed.
‘May’s famously long extremities are demurely arranged in her customary finishing-school stance – knees tightly together, calves at a flattering diagonal, feet neatly aligned. It’s a studied pose that reminds us that for all her confidence, she is ever the vicar’s daughter, always respectful and anxious not to put a foot wrong.
‘Sturgeon’s shorter but undeniably more shapely shanks are altogether more flirty, tantalisingly crossed, with the dominant leg pointing towards her audience.
If you see a Daily Mail tomorrow... #ripitup— Alastair Campbell (@campbellclaret) March 27, 2017
‘It’s a direct attempt at seduction: her stiletto is not quite dangling off her foot, but it could be.’
Politicians, journalists and commentators queued up on Twitter to lambast the front page.
Former Labour leader Ed Miliband tweeted: ‘The 1950s called and asked for their headline back’.
Labour MP Yvette Cooper wrote: ‘It’s 2017. Two women’s decisions will determine if United Kingdom continues to exist. And front page news is their lower limbs. Obviously’.
Her fellow MP Harriet Harman simply called it ‘moronic’.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn tweeted: ‘This sexism should be consigned to history. Shame on the Daily Mail’.
It's 2017. This sexism must be consigned to history. Shame on the Daily Mail. http://pic.twitter.com/V3RpFSgfnO— Jeremy Corbyn MP (@jeremycorbyn) March 27, 2017
In the Scottish edition of the Daily Mail, the front page carried the same photograph but a different headline: ‘Oh so frosty! Secrets of Nicola and PM’s talk-in’.
Interesting the Daily Mail's Scottish edition choses not to involve itself in the discussion over Theresa May and Nicola Sturgeon's legs http://pic.twitter.com/zutHRnYovs— Adrian Rutherford (@arutherfordNI) March 27, 2017
Later editions of the Mail ran the line, ‘Sarah Vine’s light-hearted verdict on the big showdown’.